Lesson 6 - Design of Fermentation Vessels
This unit began with the principles that underpin fermentation. This lesson now explores how these are put into practice. It covers how fermentation vessels must be designed to suit the behaviour of the yeast strain being used, as well as the nature, scale, and sophistication of the processes available.
Criteria for Selecting a Fermentation System
As we have seen, there are many different fermentation systems available for use and, therefore, we need some criteria in order to make an informed decision over which to choose.
Brewing has a long history and this is reflected in the variety of fermentation systems that have been developed over time. Traditional designs are often quite small by current standards, are made from traditional materials such as wood or slate, and often have strong geographical associations with particular beer styles. Linked to this are the different types of brewing yeast associated with particular beer styles, especially their cropping behaviour and how this impacts on fermenter design.
Many traditional fermenter designs continue to be used, often because it is considered that they have a critical influence on beer quality and in any case can be useful marketing tools. Some traditional designs continue to be built, although often with modifications to improve performance; for example, the conversion of open square vessels into closed versions to improve hygiene.
The development of the modern industrial brewing industry has been accompanied by the introduction of generally bigger vessels, usually closed designs, made from stainless steel. Some of these designs are linked to particular periods in the brewing industry. For example, the introduction of vessels such as the Rainier and Asahi types, both of very large capacity and designed especially for uni-tank processes, responded to the high demand for particular beer brands in the USA.
Currently, the cylindroconical fermenter is the most popular design. It can be used for most beer styles but is especially suitable for producing pilsner-style pale lager beers, which account for most of the world’s leading brands, using intensive processes such as high gravity brewing.
Criteria for fermenter selection are summarised in the following table:
Table: Criteria for selection of fermenter type
|
|
Open Square / Round |
Closed Square |
Box |
Horizontal Cylinder |
Vertical Cylinder |
|
Beer Style |
Ale |
Usually ale |
Any |
Any |
Any |
|
Capacity |
Usually quite small (50-250 hl) |
Usually quite small (50-250 hl) |
Moderate (50-500 hl) |
Any but often smaller than vertical types |
Any (conicals up to 10,000 hl) |
|
Yeast type |
Top cropping only |
Top cropping only |
Any |
Any |
Any |
|
Yeast Crop |
Top cropping Difficult to automate
|
Top cropping Difficult to automate |
Bottom cropping. Difficult to automate |
Bottom cropping Can be automated but more difficult |
Bottom cropping Can be automated More efficient cropping with cylindroconical designs |
|
Crop Quality |
Produces very clean yeast crop if properly managed Least stressful system for yeast |
Produces very clean yeast crop if properly managed Least stressful system for yeast |
Crops always contaminated with non-yeast solids Low stress levels on yeast |
Crops always contaminated with non-yeast solids Low stress levels on yeast |
Crops always contaminated with non-yeast solids Can be very stressful for yeast which may limit number of fermentation cycles |
|
Hygiene |
Open design increases risks of contamination Manual cleaning required. |
Semi-open design increases risks of contamination CIP possible |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|
Space Utilisation |
Poor Must be indoors |
Poor Must be indoors |
Moderate (can be stacked) Usually indoors |
Moderate (can be stacked) Can be in or outdoors |
Excellent Can be in or outdoors |
|
Suitability for Uni-Tank Operation |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Efficiency of Attemperation |
Poor, not really suitable for low temperature fermentations |
Average but not really suitable for low temperature fermentations |
Satisfactory |
Good |
Good, but poor mixing in very large vessels hampers good attemperation. |
|
Suitability for Automation |
Limited |
Limited |
Moderate |
Good |
Good |