You have earned 0 point(s) out of 0 point(s) thus far.

Criteria for Selecting a Fermentation System

As we have seen, there are many different fermentation systems available for use and, therefore, we need some criteria in order to make an informed decision over which to choose.

Brewing has a long history and this is reflected in the variety of fermentation systems that have been developed over time. Traditional designs are often quite small by current standards, are made from traditional materials such as wood or slate, and often have strong geographical associations with particular beer styles. Linked to this are the different types of brewing yeast associated with particular beer styles, especially their cropping behaviour and how this impacts on fermenter design.

Many traditional fermenter designs continue to be used, often because it is considered that they have a critical influence on beer quality and in any case can be useful marketing tools. Some traditional designs continue to be built, although often with modifications to improve performance; for example, the conversion of open square vessels into closed versions to improve hygiene.

The development of the modern industrial brewing industry has been accompanied by the introduction of generally bigger vessels, usually closed designs, made from stainless steel. Some of these designs are linked to particular periods in the brewing industry. For example, the introduction of vessels such as the Rainier and Asahi types, both of very large capacity and designed especially for uni-tank processes, responded to the high demand for particular beer brands in the USA.

Currently, the cylindroconical fermenter is the most popular design. It can be used for most beer styles but is especially suitable for producing pilsner-style pale lager beers, which account for most of the world’s leading brands, using intensive processes such as high gravity brewing.

Criteria for fermenter selection are summarised in the following table:

Table: Criteria for selection of fermenter type

 

Open Square / Round

Closed Square

Box

Horizontal Cylinder

Vertical Cylinder

Beer Style

Ale

Usually ale

Any

Any

Any

Capacity

Usually quite small

(50-250 hl)

Usually quite small

(50-250 hl)

Moderate

(50-500 hl)

Any but often smaller than vertical types

Any

(conicals up to 10,000 hl)

Yeast type

Top cropping only

Top cropping only

Any

Any

Any

Yeast Crop

Top cropping

Difficult to automate

 

Top cropping

Difficult to automate

Bottom cropping.

Difficult to automate

Bottom cropping

Can be automated but more difficult

Bottom cropping

Can be automated

More efficient cropping with cylindroconical designs

Crop Quality

Produces very clean yeast crop if properly managed

Least stressful system for yeast

Produces very clean yeast crop if properly managed

Least stressful system for yeast

Crops always contaminated with non-yeast solids

Low stress levels on yeast

Crops always contaminated with non-yeast solids

Low stress levels on yeast

Crops always contaminated with non-yeast solids

Can be very stressful for yeast which may limit number of fermentation cycles

Hygiene

Open design increases risks of contamination

Manual cleaning required.

Semi-open design increases risks of contamination

CIP possible

Good

Good

Good

Space Utilisation

Poor

Must be indoors

Poor

Must be indoors

Moderate (can be stacked)

Usually indoors

Moderate (can be stacked)

Can be in or outdoors

Excellent

Can be in or outdoors

Suitability for Uni-Tank Operation

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Efficiency of Attemperation

Poor, not really suitable for low temperature fermentations

Average but not really suitable for low temperature fermentations

Satisfactory

Good

Good, but poor mixing in very large vessels hampers good attemperation.

Suitability for Automation

Limited

Limited

Moderate

Good

Good

You have completed 0% of the lesson
0%