Lesson 4 - The Mashing Process
This lesson discusses the process of mashing. It provides an overview and sets out the objectives of the process before explaining what parameters need to be controlled to ensure success. It describes the various methods used to mash and their impact on the wort produced. Finally, it details the composition of wort produced by mashing.
Fermentability and Summary
One of (if not the) most important objective of mashing is to obtain the required sugar spectrum. The sugar spectrum is key to fermentability.
Most yeasts used in commercial brewing can only ferment mono, di and trisaccharides. Earlier, we said that a typical wort is around 75% fermentable, so 75% of the wort by weight will be these sugars. To determine how fermentable a wort is, we undertake a wort attenuation limit (WAL) test (also called a limit attenuation).
The word attenuate means to make thin or weak, and in brewing, we use it to describe the reduction in the gravity or extract in the wort by yeast.
In a WAL test, wort is added to a flask with 7.5 g/100 mL of compressed yeast. The flask containing the wort and yeast is then kept warm and shaken to enable the yeast to consume all the sugar in the wort. This accelerates fermentation so we can get an idea of the fermentability of the wort in the lab before it has fermented in the brewery. The test is complete when the gravity of the wort ceases to fall. The gravity at this point is called the attenuation limit.
The gravity before and after the WAL test is measured, and from this, we can calculate the percentage of apparent attenuation.
OG = original gravity of wort added to flask
PG = attenuation limit test gravity
We use the word apparent because the yeast converts most of the sugar to ethanol. The gravity of ethanol is lower than that of water, so the drop in gravity is actually greater than it would be if solely caused by the reduction in the concentration of sugars. We can apply a factor to roughly account for the difference in gravity caused by the increase in ethanol. Once we have done this, the figure is called the percentage real attenuation and is the percentage fermentability of the wort. Here’s the calculation.
So, for our typical 75% fermentable wort, it would look like this:
We can also calculate the fermentability of our worts fermented in the brewery using the OG and PG in the same way. The WAL is almost always lower than the PG achieved in the brewery, so this figure will be a lower percentage.
Regularly undertaking WAL tests on wort produced in mashing highlights changes in the level of fermentability. We need to maintain a consistent WAL and hence level of fermentability in the wort for each brand produced. If our WAL test shows there is a change in fermentability, we need to adjust our mashing parameters to redress the change.
As with most things in brewing, the key to successful mashing is consistency.
Outcomes of mashing - summary
We can bring our discussion of the mashing process to a close by summarising the effects of mashing on downstream processes and beer quality. Depending on how well we have done our job in mashing these effects can be negative or positive. The table below provides a brief summary.
Table: Summary of the downstream effects of mashing
|
Process stage |
Positive |
Negative |
|
Wort separation |
Maintaining correct particle size and achieving adequate breakdown of β-glucans and pentosans allows effective wort separation. Correct pH at end of mashing helps minimise wort viscosity and extraction of polyphenols. |
Too much undegraded β-glucan/pentosan or gelling through high agitator speeds and damage to husk particles can give poor/slow wort separation. |
|
Wort boiling |
Correct pH at end of mashing helps minimise colour pick up and helps achieve the target pH for the end of the boil. |
Excessive protein breakdown causes excessive colour and flavour pick up. Inadequate protein degradation increases trub formation, reducing hop utilisation. |
|
Wort clarification |
Ensuring adequate breakdown of β-glucans and pentosans helps effective wort clarification in hop backs and whirlpools. |
Inadequate protein degradation increases trub volume making clarification more difficult. |
|
Fermentation |
Correct sugar spectrum gives consistent fermentations in the target timeframe. |
Inadequate production of FAN or provision of other nutrients leads to poor/slow/inconsistent fermentations and inadequately attenuated beer. |
|
Filtration |
Adequate protein. β-glucans and pentosan breakdown allows effective beer filtration. |
Inadequate protein. β-glucans and pentosan breakdown gives slow beer filtration and reduces the volume of beer required to block filters. |
|
Beer foam |
The correct level of protein breakdown ensures sufficient foam stabilising proteins and polypeptides are available to provide a stable beer foam. Maintaining correct pH provides improved foam stability. |
Excessive lipid extraction and protein/polyphenol breakdown causes reduction in foam stability. |
|
Beer flavour |
Achieving a consistent sugar spectrum helps ensure consistent beer palate and aroma. |
Poor fermentations due to low FAN lead to off flavour formation and inconsistent attenuation. Excessive breakdown of protein and polypeptides is thought to lead to reduced body in beer. High levels of FAN can lead to excessive levels of Maillard reaction derived flavour compounds. |
|
Beer colloidal stability |
Sufficient breakdown of haze forming proteins improves colloidal stability. |
Extraction of haze forming polyphenols reduces colloidal stability. Inadequate conversion of starch or breakdown of pentosans and β-glucans also causes hazes. |
|
Beer flavour stability |
Minimising LOX activity and oxygen pick up improves flavour stability. Correct pH in mashing improves flavour stability. |
Extraction of lipids reduces flavour stability. Excessive FAN production can lead to formation of Strecker aldehydes in the boil which can lead to stale flavour. Higher thermal loads in mashing reduce flavour stability. |